Abstract: Effectiveness of remifentanil versus traditional fentanyl-based anesthetic in high-risk outpatient surgery.

Authors:

Mackey JJ, Parker SD, Nass CM, Snyder DS, Curreri S, Kazim D, Zuckerman RL, Fleisher LA.

Institution:

Department of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Source:

J Clin Anesth. 2000 Sep;12(6):427-32.

Abstract:

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if remifentanil would offer a superior hemodynamic and recovery profile compared to the current standard of care, which implements a fentanyl-based technique. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind study. SETTING: Outpatient center associated with tertiary care center. PATIENTS: 75 outpatients undergoing microsuspension laryngoscopy.Interventions: Patients were randomized to either a remifentanil induction (0.5 microg/kg/min) and maintenance (0.25 microg/kg/min) versus fentanyl (maximum of 250 microg) as the only opioid. All patients received propofol as part of the induction and maintenance with or without the use of nitrous oxide. MEASUREMENTS: Assessment of hemodynamics [heart rate (HR) and blood pressure(BP)], presence of perioperative myocardial ischemia on ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, and time to discharge. MAIN RESULTS: Significantly fewer patients in the remifentanil group demonstrated episodes of tachycardia (HR > 100 beats per min) compared to the fentanyl group (14% vs. 40%, p<0.05), with significantly fewer episodes of tachycardia and hypertension per patient. Recovery profiles between the two groups did not show clinically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil, a new short-acting opioid, offers excellent hemodynamic control for brief, intense outpatient procedures performed in high-risk patients; however, its use was not associated with any improvement in recovery profiles.

Keywords:

ENT Surgery Analgesia Opioid Remifentanil Fentanyl